Make it 16: An opportunity and a challenge
Noma | 23 | ACT
Gen Z has emerged as a powerful political force in Australia—organising around climate action, affordable housing, university debt, First Nations justice, and mental health. In the 2022 Australian federal election, the engagement of younger generations, particularly Gen Z and Millennials, challenged the traditional dominance of Baby Boomers in the electorate. This growing influence raises the question of the impact that votes at 16 might have on youth voice and participation in the democratic process.
On one hand, 16-year-olds cannot drink alcohol, live independently without support systems, or join the military without parental/carer consent. Some might therefore argue that they are not mature enough to be entrusted with the right to vote. However, this is not the full story.
Many young Australians have relevant lived experiences and a stake in the decisions affecting their daily lives. They go to school, use public transport, work casual jobs, and experience the consequences of policies on mental health, housing, and education firsthand. Many also engage critically with political content, participate in protests, organise campaigns, and serve on youth advisory councils, demonstrating awareness and responsibility. If they’re old enough to contribute in these ways, should they not have a say in who governs them? Might their involvement in elections not offer an opportunity to harness a larger segment of valuable lived experience?
However, lowering the voting age isn’t just about counting votes—it’s about respecting voices, empowering participation, and recognising that democracy is strongest when all citizens have the tools and education to engage meaningfully. This is where the challenge lies.
Without careful implementation, lowering the voting age could create a new demographic for political marketing rather than genuine representation. Political campaigns increasingly use flashy Instagram graphics and viral TikTok trends to capture youth attention—but catchy videos are no substitute for youth-informed policy.
Ultimately, the argument shouldn’t focus solely on lowering the voting age. The real change lies in how those in power listen to young people and include their perspectives in decision-making. Engaging with young people meaningfully is the key to securing their future. Granting the right to cast a ballot alone is not enough.